Women: Humans or Objects?

 

Written by Ed Yong for Not Exactly Rocket Science

For something intangible, a glance can be a powerful thing. It can carry the weight of culture and history, it can cause psychological harm, and it can act as a muzzle. Consider the relatively simple act of a man staring at a woman's body. This is such a common part of modern society that most of us rarely stop to think of its consequences, much less investigate it with a scientific lens.

 

Tamar Saguy is different. Leading a team of Israeli and US psychologists, she has shown that women become more silent if they think that men are focusing on their bodies. They showed that women who were asked to introduce themselves to an anonymous male partner spent far less time talking about themselves if they believed that their bodies were being checked out. Men had no such problem. Nor, for that matter, did women if they thought they were being inspected by another woman.

 

Saguy's study is one of the first to provide evidence of the social harms of sexual objectification – the act of treating people as "de-personalised objects of desire instead of as individuals with complex personalities". It targets women more often than men. It's apparent in magazine covers showing a woman in a sexually enticing pose, in inappropriate comments about a colleague's appearance, and in unsolicited looks at body parts. These looks were what Saguy focused on.

 

She recruited 207 students, 114 of whom were women, on the pretence of studying how people communicate using expressions, gestures and vocal cues. Each one sat alone in a room with a recorder and video camera. They had two minutes to introduce themselves to a male or female partner, using a list of topics such as "plans for the future" or "four things you like doing the most". The partner was supposedly sat in the next room and either watching the speaker from the neck up, watching from the neck down, or just listening on audio. The camera was tilted or blocked accordingly.

 

Saguy found that women talked about themselves for less time than men, but only if they thought they were being visually inspected by a man, and particularly if they thought their bodies were being checked out. They used the full two minutes if they were describing themselves to another woman (no matter where the camera was pointing) or if they were speaking to a man who could hear but not see them. But if their partner was a man watching their bodies, they spoke for just under one-and-a-half minutes. You can see these differences in the graph below (although note that the y-axis starts at 60, a practice I don't particularly like).

 

Men had no such qualms. They used the full two minutes regardless of whether they were being watched or listened to, and no matter the gender of their partner. The fact that men didn't react in the same way is important. For a start, it shows that it's a man's gaze and not just any downward glance that affects a woman's behaviour. It also puts paid to the false equivalence arguments that are often put forward when discussing gender issues (i.e. "women look at male bodies too"). 

 

 

When the students answered a questionnaire after the experiment, both men and women "felt more like a body than as a real person" if the camera focused on them from the neck down. But only the women were really put off by it. Around 61% of them disliked the body-pointed camera, compared to just 32% who disliked the face-pointing one or 7% who disliked the audio. For the men, 36% disliked the body camera, 42% disliked the face one and 22% disliked the audio. 

 

 

As Saguy explains, "When a woman believes that a man is focusing on her body, she narrows her presence… by spending less time talking." There are a few possible reasons for this. Saguy suspects that objectification prompts women to align their behaviour with what's expected of them – silent things devoid of other interesting traits. Treat someone like an object, and they'll behave like one. Alternatively, worries about their appearance might simply distract them from the task at hand.

Obviously, this experiment used a fairly artificial scenario. In the real world, social interactions are more complicated and objectification can take place more subtly, with a quick glance rather than a blatantly angled camera.

 

Even so, these behaviours don't go unnoticed. They could be major problems if the same detrimental silencing effect in Saguy's study applies in real-world situations where being vocal is important for success – job interviews, work meetings, networking sessions, classrooms and more. There will always be hardened lechers among us but often, objectification happens without us thinking about it or becoming aware of it. It's time, perhaps, that more of us did.

Reference: Saguy et al. 2010. Interacting Like a Body: Objectification Can Lead Women to Narrow Their Presence in Social Interactions. Psychological Science http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797609357751

Advertisements

30 thoughts on “Women: Humans or Objects?

  1. Creative agency Surrey says:

    Youre so cool! I dont suppose Ive read anything like this before. So nice to find somebody with some original thoughts on this subject. realy thank you for starting this up. this website is something that is needed on the web, someone with a little originality. useful job for bringing something new to the internet!

    Like

  2. debt advice uk says:

    I discovered your blog web site on google and examine just a few of your early posts. Proceed to maintain up the very good operate. I just extra up your RSS feed to my MSN Information Reader. Looking for ahead to reading more from you afterward!…

    Like

  3. kortingscode says:

    I’m impressed, I must say. Very rarely do I come across a blog that’s both informative and entertaining, and let me tell you, you’ve hit the nail on the head. Your blog is important, the issue is something that not enough people are talking intelligently about

    Like

  4. garden styles says:

    I have to show my thanks to this writer just for bailing me out of this situation. Right after surfing throughout the world wide web and finding advice which are not powerful, I figured my entire life was well over. Living minus the strategies to the problems you’ve sorted out by way of your main post is a serious case, and those that could have adversely damaged my entire career if I had not encountered your web site. Your personal talents and kindness in dealing with every aspect was useful. I’m not sure what I would’ve done if I hadn’t discovered such a subject like this. It’s possible to now look forward to my future. Thanks for your time very much for this impressive and result oriented help. I will not be reluctant to endorse the website to any person who needs care about this issue.

    Like

  5. geek movies says:

    There are some interesting points in time in this article but I don’t know if I see all of them center to heart. There is some validity but I will take hold opinion until I look into it further. Good article , thanks and we want more! Added to FeedBurner as well…

    Like

  6. improve golf swing says:

    Please let me know if you’re looking for a author for your blog. You have some really good posts and I feel I would be a good asset. If you ever want to take some of the load off, I’d really like to write some articles for your blog in exchange for a link back to mine. Please send me an email if interested. Many thanks!

    Like

  7. western isles opticians says:

    The very heart of your writing whilst sounding reasonable initially, did not really sit perfectly with me personally after some time. Somewhere throughout the sentences you managed to make me a believer unfortunately just for a very short while. I still have a problem with your leaps in assumptions and one might do nicely to fill in those breaks. When you can accomplish that, I could undoubtedly end up being fascinated.

    Like

  8. Lavern Lewars says:

    I recently came across your article and have been reading along. I want to express my admiration of your writing skill and ability to make readers read from the beginning to the end. I would like to read newer posts and to share my thoughts with you.

    Like

  9. ufo led grow light says:

    The various types of these lamps include High Pressure Sodium (HPS) Lamps, Incandescent Grow Lights, LED Grow Lights and Metal Halide Lamps. While many or all of them have been popular at one timeframe and are still utilizedin this point of time to some level, LED Grow Lamps are the highly chosen light sources since the point in time they were introduced.

    Like

  10. hotels in mitcham says:

    It’s a pity you don’t have a donate button! I’d definitely donate to this outstanding blog! I guess for now i’ll settle for book-marking and adding your RSS feed to my Google account. I look forward to fresh updates and will talk about this blog with my Facebook group. Talk soon!

    Like

  11. Ultimate mmorpg 2010 says:

    Good day, you should are you able to convey to myself why can you select this because now i am definitely not joyful cause i do not see in which can you wat to realize discussing the following?? apart variety the item you’ve got a beneficial website! Ah around forget your current sitemap is not functioning. Thanks Jonh.

    Like

  12. gps watch says:

    This is some reliable stuff. It took me some time to find this internet site but it was worth the time. I noticed this content was buried in google and not the number one spot. This site has a lot of nice stuff and it doesnt deserve to be burried in the searches like that. By the way I am going to save this web site to my favorites.

    Like

  13. LG Thrill Accessories says:

    You really make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find this topic to be really something which I think I would never understand. It seems too complicated and very broad for me. I am looking forward for your next post, I will try to get the hang of it!

    Like

  14. bachelorette party invites says:

    Extraordinary this post is totaly unrelated to what I was searching google for, however it was once listed at the first page. I assume your doing something proper if Google likes you enough to place you on the first page of a non comparable search.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s